tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3345776497354657426.post6539552234739849226..comments2023-07-02T06:47:29.599-07:00Comments on Kodkreatör: Minimum Viable Product = Maximum Expensive Learning?Henrik Ebbeskoghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05305732829177950446noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3345776497354657426.post-31078136319188574752019-11-13T11:28:49.811-08:002019-11-13T11:28:49.811-08:00I found so many interesting stuff in your blog esp...I found so many interesting stuff in your blog especially its discussion. Really its great article. Keep it up. <a href="https://s2toy.com" rel="nofollow">성인용품창업</a><br />ayanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02066898073106439423noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3345776497354657426.post-55129727125063502502018-01-18T07:27:42.380-08:002018-01-18T07:27:42.380-08:00Though if you use the first image you can't re...Though if you use the first image you can't really say that a skateboard is wrong IF the customers needed cars because if you evaluate the problem and come to the conclusion that they need cars, then a skateboard is not a minimal viable product anymore and thus wouldn't be on the picture.<br /><br />And you can't have 'car' as a need. You can only have what the car does as a Tomas Forsmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16780523823499899786noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3345776497354657426.post-87110606303506589682015-07-15T09:38:21.766-07:002015-07-15T09:38:21.766-07:00I think this is valid: "Because software is a...I think this is valid: "Because software is an expensive way of iterating to a needed capability." <br /><br />If you need a car, and you know you need a car, and the end product has to be a car, why bother building the other things? Clearly MVP isn't just a "best practice" that everyone should follow regardless of context. <br /><br />But that's really not what the Agileotterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10773578598860454277noreply@blogger.com